


Have you ever had a business idea that felt simple and exciting on Sunday night, and by Friday morning it had you exhausted? And you hadn't even made $1 from it yet?
I see it happen with entrepreneurs all the time. And if I'm being fair, I've done it myself. Absolutely. We take a really good business idea and make it so complicated that we talk ourselves right out of doing it.
You know how it goes. You have an idea for a workshop, a digital product, or a coaching program, and you can see it so clearly you can taste it. Then you start thinking about everything that has to go with it. You need a name. Then a logo. Then a workbook, a sales page, and an email sequence that grows from three emails to five to seven to 21 days. Then somebody on Instagram tells you that you need an upsell, and somebody else says you need an order bump, because we've got gurus everywhere, right? Now you're building a whole funnel, recording videos, and trying to figure out where to host them.
Your idea is probably fine. You may simply be trying to build too much, too soon. That's a very different problem, and it has a much easier fix.
I know the women in my community. We are rarely procrastinating because we're lazy or because we don't care. It's quite the opposite. We care a lot about what we put into the world.
If you're going to charge somebody money, you want her to feel like she received something valuable. You want to show up professionally, and you want your business to represent you well. There is nothing wrong with that.
The trouble starts when "I want to do this well" quietly turns into "I need to do everything before I can do anything." Those are two completely different standards.
Let's say you know how to help someone plan a month of social media content. You know it like the back of your hand. You could create a simple workshop that walks her through your process, give her a planning template, answer some questions, and send her home with next month's content mapped out. That's a legitimate offer.
But then you think, "If I'm teaching content planning, I should probably include branding too." And she'll need to know how to make reels. And reels need captions, so let's add copywriting. And she can't build a business on social media alone, so here comes email marketing.
Girl, we started out helping somebody plan her content for the month, and somehow we ended up creating a marketing degree. Meanwhile, the woman who came to you was perfectly happy to pay for help getting her post done for next Tuesday. We're solving five problems when the customer was looking for help with just one.
The online business space has conditioned us to associate quantity with value. Seventy courses for $70. One offer with 277 bonuses. If a 10-page guide is helpful, surely a 75-page guide is better. If one template solves the problem, let's give them 42. Then we put a dollar amount next to every bonus and announce that the customer is getting $8,732 worth of stuff for just $47.
You're laughing because you've seen it.
Now, there are situations where comprehensive support is appropriate. I have programs where depth is necessary because of the transformation we're working toward. Everything doesn't need to be tiny and quick. What I am saying is that the size of the product and the value of the result are two separate things.
Think about your own buying habits. How many courses do you own that you haven't finished? Don't answer that out loud. This is a safe space. How many free PDFs are sitting somewhere in your Google Docs? How many trainings did you buy because the topic was exactly what you needed, and then you logged in, saw 37 lessons, and said, "I'll come back to that when I have time"?
And "when I have time" never arrives.
For busy moms, there is enormous value in somebody saying, "Come here, girl. We're going to solve this one problem, and then I'm going to show you the shortest reasonable path to doing it yourself going forward." That feels like somebody respecting my time.
So here's the question I want you to start asking: what is the simplest version of this that still works?
The simplest version still has everything necessary to deliver the promised outcome. Cutting corners is off the table. What comes out is the pile of extras that have nothing to do with this particular result. Those extras may be good information. They may become another offer someday, or belong in an advanced program. They just don't belong here.
I've started calling this the crayon version.
Think about a little kid drawing a house. You've probably had one handed to you by your baby at some point. There's a square, a triangle on top for the roof, a couple of windows, and a door. If they're feeling fancy, there's a chimney with swirly smoke and a giant sun in the corner with a smiley face.
You look at that picture and immediately say, "Now, that's a house." Nobody says, "Excuse me, where's the electrical panel?" You don't ask the child whether the foundation passed inspection. The drawing leaves out most of what exists in a real house, and it still holds enough of the essentials for you to recognize exactly what it is.
Sometimes the thing we're creating in our businesses doesn't need to begin as the architectural blueprint. It needs to begin as the crayon version. You know what you're creating, who it's for, what it's supposed to accomplish, and what has to be there for it to work. Then you build from there.
One of the biggest traps we fall into is trying to create version 10.0 when version 1.0 hasn't even been tested.
Say you spend three months building a massive course based entirely on what you think your audience needs. You record everything, edit everything, check it once, twice, three times a lady. Then real customers get inside, and you discover that module two is where everybody gets stuck. The bonus you spent two weeks on? Nobody even got that far. And the section you almost left out is the one everybody keeps emailing you about.
That's useful information. It would have been nice to know before you spent three months building.
When you start with the crayon version, you get to create with your customer instead of guessing in isolation. You hear the language she uses. You find out what questions she actually asks, where she needs more support, and what she values enough to pay for. That makes version 2.0 so much stronger.
Suppose you want to teach new entrepreneurs how to use Canva. That's huge. Canva can do a million things now, with AI and code and all kinds of stuff, so you've handed yourself a massive project.
Instead, ask what specific problem you're equipped to solve. Maybe the women in your audience are struggling to create a lead magnet that looks professional. Now we have something. Your offer helps her create one polished lead magnet in Canva.
Later, you may discover those same customers want help with social media graphics. That's another offer. Maybe they want to turn a workbook into a digital product. There's another one. Instead of stuffing everything into one giant course, you're developing a suite of solutions that build on each other and can be sold separately or together. One customer can have more than one problem you're equipped to solve, and from a business perspective, that is a very good thing.
I talk about this through the lens of motherhood because that's who I serve, and because I live it too.
You're getting children to school and activities. There's dinner, homework, appointments, your marriage, your church, and maybe aging parents who need you. Hopefully somewhere in there you're taking care of yourself. So when someone tells a mom entrepreneur to "just block out four hours every day and work on your business," I sometimes wonder what household they're living in.
You can still build something meaningful. Your business model and the way you create simply need to respect the reality of your life. That's a big part of what I mean by harmony over hustle.
Harmony still takes work. Building a business requires it. I just refuse to glorify unnecessary work. If something can be done effectively in five steps, I don't need to turn it into 15 so I can say I worked harder. I'd rather spend that energy somewhere that actually matters.
Let's go a little deeper, because complexity can be more than a strategy problem. Sometimes we're hiding behind it.
As long as you're building, you don't have to sell.
I've found that to be true in my own life. Build, build, build. Create, create, create. Plan, plan, plan. You can spend six weeks on a course and tell yourself you're making progress every day, and technically you are. But eventually you have to put a price on it and say, "Would you like to buy this?" That's a vulnerable moment. Someone can say yes. Someone can also say no.
So adding another module feels safer than making the offer. Tweaking the logo feels productive. Changing the font again feels like work. But if the offer can already solve the problem you promised to solve, those activities become very sophisticated forms of avoidance.
I've had to sit with this question myself: am I improving this because it genuinely needs improvement, or because I'm nervous about putting it in front of people?
The way through is giving yourself permission to learn in public. Your first version is allowed to change. You can launch something and improve it. You can teach a workshop and adjust a section next time. You can update a digital product after customers use it, test your pricing, and refine your messaging. That's normal business development.
We put so much pressure on the first version, as though we're signing a lifetime contract with it. You're not. The goal of version one is to create something useful, get it into the hands of the right people, deliver what you promised, and pay attention to what you learn.
Grab a piece of paper and write down one offer or idea you've been thinking about but haven't finished. One. Don't pick five. We're following crayon instructions here.
Underneath it, answer two questions:
What specific result would someone pay me to help them achieve? Answer without describing your product. "Six modules and a workbook" is a description. The result is what she walks away with: her first Etsy listing published, her coaching offer defined and priced, her first month of content created.
What would I absolutely have to include for someone to achieve that result? Start there. Then look at everything else you planned and ask whether it's necessary for this particular promise.
You may be surprised by how much you can remove without reducing the value. Sometimes removing things makes the offer stronger, because your customer can clearly see where you're taking her.
This is the thinking behind something you may have heard me mention: Sell It Simple: The Crayon Offer Method. Random cheap products thrown together just to have something to sell? I'm not advocating no such foolishness. The method is about becoming disciplined enough to simplify your expertise into a clear offer that solves a specific problem and gives your buyer a meaningful win.
For a lot of us, that's harder than creating more. When you know a lot, you want to teach a lot. But the person buying from you doesn't need everything you know. She needs the part of your expertise that solves the problem she has right now.
This week, go back to the idea you wrote down and don't add a single thing to it. Clarify it instead. Look at the promise, the person, the result, and everything you decided had to be included. Then figure out what version you could realistically create, sell, and deliver well with the capacity you have right now.
Not someday when the kids are older, or when work slows down, or when you finally get caught up on everything. Listen, I'm 51 and I'm still waiting for that week.
I would much rather see you put one useful, well-positioned offer into the marketplace than spend six months planning an impressive one that nobody has the opportunity to buy. There will be time to make it bigger, better, and prettier. There will be time for automation and funnels and the next product. First, we need something that works.
If a child can communicate "house" with a square, a triangle, a door, and two windows, maybe we can stop requiring architectural blueprints before we're willing to show anybody what we've created.